Spray Uniformity of a Remotely Piloted Aircraft System for Precision Agriculture
PDF

Keywords

RPAS Spraying
Spraying Uniformity
Droplet Density
Application Rate
Swath Width
Flight Speed

Abstract

Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS) offer fast, precise, and efficient application of pest control chemicals, playing a vital role in effective crop management. RPAS are a key innovation in mechanized agriculture, offering precise application of fertilizers and pesticides to reduce waste, minimize environmental impact, and enhance crop yield when combined with other modern farming practices. This study evaluates the spray uniformity of a remotely piloted aircraft system at different flight speeds (3 m/s and 5 m/s) to determine its effectiveness in aerial spraying applications. The experiment assessed droplet deposition, size distribution, and uniformity using water-sensitive paper (WSP) and the DepositScan software. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and an independent t-test to compare to treatments. Results indicate that droplet density and uniformity were highest at the center of the spray path, with greater dispersion occurring at the edges. The effective swath width was 8.8 m at 3 m/s and 8.0 m at 5 m/s, with coefficient of variation (CV) values of 10.45% and 17.72%, respectively, indicating variability in coverage. The RPAS achieved an output rate of 6–11 L/min, corresponding to application rates of approximately 39–47 L/ha. Higher flight speeds improve RPAS spraying efficiency but reduce spray quality, as increased speed (3–5 m/s) leads to smaller droplets and less uniform distribution. Optimizing flight parameters is key to balancing coverage and accuracy. This study highlights RPAS’s potential in enhancing spraying uniformity for precision agriculture, particularly in smart farming and mechanized rice production, and emphasizes the need for further research to optimize calibration, reduce drift, and minimize environmental impact.

https://doi.org/10.22137/IJST.2025.000007
PDF

References

Ahmad, A. (2021). Comparative analysis of conventional and UAV-based sprayers in agricultural applications. Journal of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, 27(3), 45–56.

ASAE EP458. (1989). Spray nozzle classification by droplet spectra. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, MI, USA.

ASAE Standards. (2003). ASAE S327.2: Terminology and definitions for agricultural chemical application. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan, USA.

ASABE. (2020). S386.2 (R2018): Test procedure for determining the uniformity of water distribution from aerial application equipment. St. Joseph, MI: ASABE.

ASABE. (2020). ASABE Standards S572.1: Spray Nozzle Classification by Droplet Spectra. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers.

Baldrias, L. R., Villanueva, E. J., & Francisco, R. A. (2023). Spray characterization of an unmanned aerial vehicle for agricultural applications. The Philippine Agricultural Scientist, 106(3), 231–240.

DJI (n.d.). Agras T30.

Li, J. (2021). Environmental impacts of agrochemical use in developing agricultural economies. Environmental Science and Policy, 124, 52–60.

Li, L., Hu, Z., Liu, Q., Yi, T., Han, P., Zhang, R., & Pan, L. (2022). Effect of flight velocity on droplet deposition and drift of combined pesticides sprayed using an unmanned aerial vehicle sprayer in a peach orchard. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 981494.

García-Munguía, A., Hernández-Zamora, M., & Ruiz-Sánchez, J. (2024). Advances in drone-based pesticide application for precision agriculture. Precision Agriculture, 25(2), 189–204.

Gao, J., Peng, X., Zhu, Y., & Li, H. (2024). Study on droplet deposition characteristics and application effects of UAV sprayer spraying garden plants. Frontiers in Plant Science, XX, Article 1343793.

S386.2; ASABE Standards. Calibration and Distribution Pattern Testing of Agricultural Aerial Application Equipment. ASABE: St. Joseph, MI, USA, 2018.

Nuyttens, D., Baetens, K., De Schampheleire, M., Sonck, B., & Meirvenne, M. V. (2007). Effect of nozzle type, size, and pressure on spray droplet characteristics. Biosystems Engineering, 97(3), 333–345

Önler, E., Özyurt, H. B., Şener, M., Arat, S., Eker, B., & Çelen, İ. H. (2023). Spray characterization of an unmanned aerial vehicle for agricultural spraying. The Philippine Agricultural Scientist, 106(1), 39-46.

Wang, J., Lan, Y., Qi, H., Chen, P., Hewitt, A. J., & Wang, X. (2018). Droplet deposition and efficiency of UAV-based ultra-low-volume spray applications. Transactions of the ASABE, 61(5), 1533–1541.

Wang, D., Zhang, X., & Liu, Z. (2023). Spray drift characteristics of plant protection UAVs under varying operational parameters. Journal: Drones (MDPI)

Wang, D. (2023). Assessment of pesticide application efficiency using aerial and ground spraying methods. Agricultural Systems, 208, 103671.

Wang, Y., Li, J., Zhang, H., & Liu, X. (2024). Determination of the effective swath of a plant protection UAV adapted to mist nozzles in mountain Nangguo pear orchards. Frontiers in Plant Science, 15, 1336580.

Zhang, D., Lan, Y., Chen, P., & Wang, J. (2021). Evaluation of spray deposition and drift from agricultural UAVs under variable flight parameters. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 14(2), 15–22.

Zhou, L., He, X., Qi, J., & Xiao, H. (2021). Spray deposition and control efficacy of unmanned aerial vehicle on wheat powdery mildew. Crop Protection, 143.